Labour’s Streeting calls Brexit a ‘catastrophic mistake’ while Burnham backs eventual EU re-entry but not immediately.
- Streeting resigned as health secretary to run for Labour leader
- Streeting called Brexit a ‘catastrophic mistake’ and wants UK to rejoin EU
- Burnham sees a ‘long-term case’ for rejoining but won’t push it now
📰 Continuing coverage: Brexit looms over Labour leadership race and by-election
Wes Streeting, who stepped down as Britain’s health secretary last week, has set his sights on the Labour leadership—and his first move is to rip up the UK’s Brexit playbook. Streeting, a rising star in Keir Starmer’s government, told reporters the 2016 vote to leave the EU was a ‘catastrophic mistake’ and argued the country should start the process of rejoining the bloc. His stance puts him at odds with Labour’s current leadership and signals a potential shift in how the party handles the Brexit question if he wins the top job. Streeting resigned from the cabinet to run in what could be a crowded contest to replace Starmer as both Labour leader and prime minister. He’s not shy about his ambitions: “This is about who can take the fight to the Conservatives and win the next election,” he said in his resignation speech. But his Brexit comments risk opening old wounds in a party still split on Europe. Labour MPs are already warning that pushing for EU membership too soon could cost votes in areas that backed Leave in 2016, especially in the Midlands and the North. Streeting’s pitch isn’t just about Europe—it’s about speed. He wants Labour to move faster on policies like workers’ rights and trade deals that were harder to push while the UK was outside the EU’s single market and customs union. His critics, though, say he’s gambling with Labour’s electoral coalition by reviving a debate many voters want left behind. ## What Andy Burnham says—and why it matters Andy Burnham, the Labour mayor of Greater Manchester, has taken a softer line. Burnham, who’s running in an upcoming byelection to challenge Starmer’s leadership, told local reporters he sees a ‘long-term case’ for rejoining the EU—but stressed it’s not something he’d push for right now. His approach reflects the cautious pragmatism that’s defined Labour’s Brexit strategy since Starmer took over. Burnham’s stance is partly a reflection of his region: Greater Manchester voted 53% to Leave in 2016, and the area’s economy still depends heavily on trade with Europe. But Burnham isn’t advocating a quick return. Instead, he’s focusing on immediate fixes like better EU funding for local businesses and easier travel rules for young people. His message to voters is simple: don’t expect Labour to reopen the Brexit fight while the party’s trying to win back trust on other issues. That cautious tone puts him closer to Starmer’s line, even if he’s willing to keep the door open to EU membership in the future. ## Where Labour stands—and where it could go The clash between Streeting and Burnham isn’t just about personalities. It’s a sign of a deeper debate inside Labour about how to handle Brexit without alienating the party’s base. Streeting’s hardline stance could energize younger, urban voters who overwhelmingly backed Remain in 2016. But it risks pushing away working-class voters in towns that flipped from Labour to the Conservatives after Brexit, like Walsall or Dudley. Burnham’s approach is more about damage control. He’s betting that voters care more about cost-of-living crises and NHS waits than Brexit nostalgia. But his ‘long-term case’ leaves room for future leaders to push harder—especially if the economy stalls or trade deals underperform. Labour’s official policy hasn’t changed. The party still says it won’t seek to rejoin the EU while in government, but it does want closer ties on things like science funding and climate rules. Streeting and Burnham are testing the edges of that position. ## What happens next—and who really decides The Labour leadership race could last months, and the winner won’t get to decide Brexit policy alone. Any push to rejoin the EU would need a referendum, and even then, it’d face massive hurdles in Parliament and with the public. The Conservatives would almost certainly oppose it, and polls show most Brits don’t want another divisive vote. Streeting’s best shot at pushing his agenda is if he wins the leadership—and then reshapes Labour’s platform before the next election. Burnham’s role is trickier. His byelection run is a protest against Starmer, not a policy platform. If he loses, his influence fades. If he wins, he’s still just one voice in a big party. The real test will come if Labour loses the next election. A defeat could force the party to rethink its Brexit stance entirely—especially if voters in Leave areas punish Labour for not delivering on their promises. Until then, the debate stays in the background, where it’s been since Starmer took over. But Streeting’s move shows the issue isn’t dead—and it could flare up fast if Labour starts losing ground to smaller parties like Reform UK on the right or the Greens on the left.
What You Need to Know
- Source: The Guardian
- Published: May 17, 2026 at 16:29 UTC
- Category: Politics
- Topics: #guardian · #politics · #election · #labour · #wes-streeting
Read the Full Story
This is a curated summary. For the complete article, original data, quotes and full analysis:
All reporting rights belong to the respective author(s) at The Guardian. GlobalBR News summarizes publicly available content to help readers discover the most relevant global news.
Curated by GlobalBR News · May 17, 2026
Related Articles
🇧🇷 Resumo em Português
A possibilidade de o Reino Unido rever sua decisão de deixar a União Europeia (UE) ganha força no cenário político britânico, dividindo até mesmo figuras do Partido Trabalhista, principal oposição ao governo conservador. Wes Streeting e Andy Burnham, pré-candidatos à liderança trabalhista, expuseram visões opostas sobre a hipótese de um novo ingresso, enquanto o partido tenta encontrar um meio-termo entre as pressões internas e a realidade pós-Brexit.
O debate ocorre em um momento crucial para o Reino Unido, que enfrenta desafios econômicos e sociais agravados pela saída da UE, como escassez de mão de obra em setores-chave e dificuldades no comércio internacional. No Brasil, o tema interessa não apenas por sua relevância global, mas também porque reflete os impactos de políticas protecionistas e desintegradoras, um debate que ecoa em discussões sobre acordos comerciais e soberania. Para os leitores brasileiros, a situação britânica serve como um estudo de caso sobre os custos e benefícios da integração regional, um tema sempre presente em nossa política externa.
Enquanto a ala mais pragmática do Trabalhista defende a necessidade de reavaliar o Brexit, a ala tradicional resiste a qualquer aproximação com Bruxelas, temendo alienar eleitores. A próxima batalha será travar dentro do partido, que ainda não definiu uma posição oficial, enquanto a sociedade britânica segue dividida entre o desejo de reconectar-se à Europa e o receio de novos erros políticos.
🇪🇸 Resumen en Español
La sombra del Brexit sigue dividiendo a las filas laboristas británicas, donde dos figuras clave del partido, Wes Streeting y Andy Burnham, abogan por caminos opuestos sobre la posible reintegración del Reino Unido en la Unión Europea. Mientras el primero se muestra partidario de explorar esa opción en un futuro, el segundo se inclina por priorizar la estabilidad interna antes de plantear un giro de tal envergadura, reflejando las tensiones internas en el principal partido de la oposición.
La polémica surge en un contexto de creciente descontento social con las consecuencias económicas del divorcio con Bruselas, que ha dejado secuelas como la inflación, los problemas en las cadenas de suministro y la incertidumbre en sectores clave. Para los hispanohablantes, especialmente aquellos con vínculos económicos o migratorios en el Reino Unido, esta división interna del laborismo subraya la fragilidad de un proceso —el Brexit— que muchos ya consideran irreversible, pero cuyas heridas políticas y económicas aún sangran. La postura que finalmente adopte el partido determinará no solo su estrategia electoral, sino también la posibilidad de que Londres y Bruselas encuentren, tarde o temprano, un nuevo terreno de diálogo.
The Guardian
Read full article at The Guardian →This post is a curated summary. All rights belong to the original author(s) and The Guardian.
Was this article helpful?
Discussion