The courtroom clash between Elon Musk and Sam Altman took a theatrical turn in its final week. Altman, CEO of OpenAI, faced tough questions about his honesty. Lawyers for the plaintiff—Elon Musk—argued Altman had a history of misleading statements and self-dealing with companies that profit from OpenAI’s work. Altman pushed back hard, calling the accusations baseless and pointing to his decade-long work building AI tools that millions use daily. “I’ve never lied to make a buck,” Altman told the jury, his voice steady despite five days of intense grilling. The judge allowed the claim to stand, meaning the jury will weigh Altman’s version against Musk’s accusations when they deliberate starting Monday.

Musk, for his part, didn’t get grilled directly—but his motives were front and center. Musk’s legal team argued he wanted to steer OpenAI toward building artificial general intelligence (AGI) as fast as possible, even if it meant cutting corners on safety. That, they said, made him a risk to the public. Altman’s side fired back by portraying Musk as someone who wanted to control AGI’s development just to hold power over it. “Elon doesn’t want to build safe AI,” Altman’s lawyer told the jury. “He wants to own the future.” The exchange set the stage for the jury to decide whose vision of AI’s future they trust more.

OpenAI brought the donkey trophy

The weirdest moment of the trial came when OpenAI presented a golden donkey’s ass trophy as evidence. It was a gag gift to an employee who’d been called a “jackass” by Musk’s team for pushing back on rushing toward AGI. The trophy wasn’t just a joke—it was meant to show Musk’s alleged disdain for safety-first AI development. Musk’s lawyers dismissed it as a stunt, but the jury saw it up close. One juror stared at it for a full minute before the judge moved the trial along. The trophy now sits in evidence, a symbol of how personal this fight has gotten.

Closing arguments wrapped with unflattering photos

Both sides saved their strongest shots for closing arguments. Altman’s team showed side-by-side mugshot-style photos of Musk and Altman, highlighting their contrasting public images. Musk was depicted as erratic and reckless; Altman as calm and measured. Altman’s lawyer hammered the point home: “You’re not picking between two AI companies. You’re picking between two versions of the future.” Musk’s lawyers countered with a slide show of Altman’s past tweets and statements they claimed showed a pattern of deception. The jury will see both presentations again when they review exhibits during deliberations.

The judge wrapped the trial Friday afternoon, telling jurors to expect a full day of reviewing evidence before they start deliberating Monday. They’ll focus on two core questions: Did Altman lie about OpenAI’s dealings with for-profit companies? Did Musk act in bad faith by pushing for uncontrolled AGI development? Neither question has a clear answer, but the jury’s decision will shape how the public—and Silicon Valley—view both men for years.

What happens next

If the jury sides with Musk, Altman could face legal and reputational damage that hurts OpenAI’s fundraising and partnerships. If they side with Altman, Musk’s push to rein in OpenAI’s AGI work could lose steam. Either way, the trial exposed deep rifts in Silicon Valley’s AI community. Some insiders say the fight reveals how much power one person can wield over an entire industry. Others argue it’s just two billionaires airing dirty laundry. The jury’s verdict won’t end the debate—but it might finally give the rest of us a clue about who we should trust with the future of AI.

What You Need to Know

  • Source: MIT Technology Review
  • Published: May 15, 2026 at 23:39 UTC
  • Category: Ai
  • Topics: #mit · #research · #openai · #musk · #elon-musk

Read the Full Story

This is a curated summary. For the complete article, original data, quotes and full analysis:

Read the full story on MIT Technology Review →

All reporting rights belong to the respective author(s) at MIT Technology Review. GlobalBR News summarizes publicly available content to help readers discover the most relevant global news.

Curated by GlobalBR News · May 15, 2026

🇧🇷 Resumo em Português

O mundo dos bilionários da tecnologia ganhou mais um capítulo de polêmica com o encerramento do julgamento entre Elon Musk e Sam Altman, onde a credibilidade de cada um foi colocada à prova diante de um júri popular. O terceiro e último semana de depoimentos foi marcada por acusações mútuas e até por uma prova inusitada: um troféu em formato de burro, usado como evidência do suposto comportamento desleal de Musk. Agora, cabe aos jurados decidir quem merece mais confiança no setor que molda o futuro da inteligência artificial.

No Brasil, onde o debate sobre regulação de IA e o poder das big techs ganha cada vez mais força, este julgamento serve como um termômetro do que pode vir por aqui. A disputa entre Musk — dono da X (ex-Twitter) e entusiasta de uma IA aberta — e Altman — CEO da OpenAI e defensor de modelos mais controlados — reflete tensões globais que também afetam o ecossistema brasileiro de startups e pesquisadores. Afinal, a credibilidade desses líderes influencia desde investimentos em inovação até políticas públicas de IA no país, que ainda engatinha em sua própria regulamentação.

Se o júri der razão a Musk, o argumento de uma IA mais livre e descentralizada pode ganhar fôlego; se Altman for absolvido, a pressão por regulações mais rígidas deve aumentar. De qualquer forma, o resultado deste caso servirá de precedente para como o Brasil e outros países lidarão com os gigantes da tecnologia nos próximos anos.