A New York jury failed to reach a unanimous verdict Friday in Harvey Weinstein’s third sex crimes trial, marking the second mistrial in a year on the same rape charge brought by Jessica Mann. The deliberations lasted three days before jurors notified Judge Curtis Farber they could not reach a decision. Farber then issued a modified deadlock instruction, known as an Allen charge, urging jurors to resume talks. They quickly responded with another note stating their position: “We feel that no one is going to change where they stand.” Nine jurors voted not guilty while three supported a guilty verdict, Weinstein’s legal team told reporters outside court. The prosecution now has until late June to decide whether to retry the case. Weinstein, the disgraced former Hollywood mogul, returned to court in April for the third New York trial focused solely on Mann’s allegations. Mann, a former aspiring actress, testified Weinstein raped her at a Manhattan DoubleTree hotel in 2013. Weinstein was first convicted of assaulting Mann in 2020, but that verdict and another charge were later overturned on appeal. In a second New York trial last summer, Weinstein was found guilty of one count of criminal sexual act in the first degree but acquitted on another charge; the rape charge ended in mistrial after the jury foreperson cited safety concerns. Outside court, 55-year-old juror Rick Treese said the panel diverged on “where we actually had facts.” The case has become a flashpoint in the #MeToo movement, which gained momentum after dozens of women came forward with allegations against Weinstein in 2017. Weinstein’s legal troubles stem from accusations spanning decades, with multiple accusers testifying in various trials. The third New York trial narrowed the scope to Mann’s claims, but the deadlock suggests persistent divisions over credibility and evidence. Legal experts note that repeated mistrials on the same charge could limit prosecutors’ willingness to retry the case, given the emotional toll on witnesses and the resources required. The outcome leaves open whether Mann’s allegations will ever be resolved in court, though the case has already left a lasting impact on public discourse about sexual misconduct in Hollywood and beyond. Weinstein remains free on bail pending any decision on a potential retrial.

What You Need to Know

  • Source: NPR
  • Published: May 15, 2026 at 18:02 UTC
  • Category: World
  • Topics: #npr · #usa · #world-news · #harvey-weinstein · #jessica-mann · #image

Read the Full Story

This is a curated summary. For the complete article, original data, quotes and full analysis:

Read the full story on NPR →

All reporting rights belong to the respective author(s) at NPR. GlobalBR News summarizes publicly available content to help readers discover the most relevant global news.

Curated by GlobalBR News · May 15, 2026

🇧🇷 Resumo em Português

O estupro de Jessica Mann por Harvey Weinstein volta ao centro das atenções após um terceiro julgamento nos EUA terminar em impasse judicial, reacendendo a discussão sobre impunidade e justiça para vítimas de crimes sexuais. A decisão do júri, dividido durante as deliberações, expõe as fragilidades do sistema penal diante de casos complexos e de alto perfil, especialmente quando a credibilidade das vítimas é questionada.

Nos Estados Unidos e no Brasil, onde debates sobre cultura do estupro e machismo estrutural ganham força, o desfecho do caso reforça a necessidade de reformas judiciais que priorizem a escuta qualificada das vítimas e a proteção contra retaliações. Para a sociedade brasileira, o episódio serve como alerta sobre os riscos de impunidade em crimes sexuais, mesmo em sistemas judiciais mais avançados, e destaca a importância de leis que garantam segurança e dignidade às mulheres. A próxima etapa do processo, prevista para junho, será crucial para definir se Weinstein enfrentará novamente o julgamento ou se a impunidade persistirá.

A decisão final poderá redefinir não apenas o destino do ex-produtor, mas também o futuro de discussões sobre justiça e direitos das vítimas no mundo todo.

🇪🇸 Resumen en Español

El tercer juicio por delitos sexuales contra el exmagnate Harvey Weinstein en Nueva York ha concluido en un mistrial tras el bloqueo del jurado, que no logró un veredicto unánime sobre la acusación de violación presentada por Jessica Mann. El proceso, que reabrió viejas heridas en el movimiento #MeToo, ha dejado al descubierto las dificultades para alcanzar justicia en casos de abuso de poder tan mediáticos como este.

El mistrial —que obligará a repetir el juicio o a archivar el caso antes de finales de junio— refleja la complejidad de los casos de violencia sexual, donde el peso de la prueba y la credibilidad de las víctimas chocan con la impunidad histórica de figuras poderosas. Para el público hispanohablante, este episodio subraya la necesidad de reformas judiciales que agilicen los procesos y protejan a las víctimas, evitando que el desgaste legal revictimice a quienes denuncian. Además, reaviva el debate sobre cómo los sistemas legales, incluso en países con leyes avanzadas, siguen fallando en la protección de las mujeres frente a abusos sistemáticos.