DOJ subpoenas BlackRock over how its private credit fund values assets.
- DOJ’s Manhattan office probes BlackRock TCP Capital Corp. valuations
- Executives questioned under seal about private credit fund practices
- BlackRock declines to comment on the investigation
The U.S. Department of Justice is digging into how BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, values private credit investments held by one of its funds. Federal prosecutors in the Southern District of New York have been asking questions about BlackRock TCP Capital Corp., a publicly traded company that lends to mid-sized businesses, according to three people familiar with the matter. The probe, which has been active for months, involves subpoenas seeking documents and records about how BlackRock assigns dollar values to these hard-to-price loans and investments. At least one executive tied to the fund has been interviewed by prosecutors, one of the people said. BlackRock, which oversees $10 trillion in assets, declined to comment. The company’s silence reflects the confidential nature of the investigation—no charges or allegations have been made publicly yet. A spokesperson for the U.S. Attorney’s office in Manhattan did not respond to requests for comment, nor did a representative for Jay Clayton, the former chair of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission who now leads the office’s Civil Division, when asked about the inquiry. Clayton has previously flagged concerns about how firms value private assets, telling reporters last fall that investors deserve transparency on how these numbers are calculated. Private credit has exploded in recent years as banks pull back from lending to smaller companies. Funds like BlackRock TCP Capital fill that gap by offering loans to businesses that can’t easily borrow elsewhere. But those loans often lack liquid markets, meaning there’s no real-time price tag. That makes valuations subjective—something regulators and prosecutors are now scrutinizing closely. The Manhattan U.S. Attorney’s office, which has taken a sharper focus on Wall Street misconduct under Clayton’s leadership, has made similar inquiries into private equity and hedge fund valuation practices before. Last year, the office secured guilty pleas from two former Goldman Sachs traders for inflating bond prices during the pandemic. The scrutiny of private credit mirrors broader concerns about the lack of transparency in how these funds report returns to investors. Unlike stocks or bonds, private loans aren’t traded daily, so firms often rely on internal models to assign value. That can lead to wide gaps between what a fund claims its assets are worth and what they’d fetch in a real sale. Investors, including pension funds and endowments, rely on those numbers to make decisions—so if the valuations are off, it could mislead them about performance. The probe is the latest sign that regulators are tightening the screws on alternative investments, where oversight has historically lagged behind traditional markets. In 2023, the SEC proposed new rules requiring private funds to provide more frequent and detailed reports on their holdings. The agency also fined several firms for misleading investors about performance metrics. If prosecutors find evidence of intentional misvaluation in BlackRock’s case, it could lead to civil charges or even criminal penalties. But the investigation is still in its early stages, and no outcome is certain. For now, BlackRock and the rest of the private credit industry are watching closely. The outcome could reshape how these funds operate—and how they’re scrutinized by law enforcement.
What You Need to Know
- Source: Fortune
- Published: May 17, 2026 at 15:34 UTC
- Category: Business
- Topics: #fortune · #business · #economy · #black · #rock · #federal
Read the Full Story
This is a curated summary. For the complete article, original data, quotes and full analysis:
All reporting rights belong to the respective author(s) at Fortune. GlobalBR News summarizes publicly available content to help readers discover the most relevant global news.
Curated by GlobalBR News · May 17, 2026
Related Articles
- Zillow’s remote-only hiring brings in talent from all 50 states
- Your fixed mortgage payment keeps rising — here’s why
- Why working-class voices matter for UK culture and media
🇧🇷 Resumo em Português
O Departamento de Justiça dos Estados Unidos (DOJ) mira o gigantesco mercado de crédito privado global ao investigar como a BlackRock, maior gestora de ativos do mundo, avalia os ativos de seu fundo privado. A apuração, conduzida pelo escritório de Manhattan, foca especificamente na BlackRock TCP Capital Corp., uma empresa de investimentos que levanta suspeitas sobre possíveis irregularidades em seus métodos de precificação.
No Brasil, onde o crédito privado tem ganhado espaço como alternativa para empresas e investidores institucionais, a notícia reforça a importância da transparência em um setor ainda pouco regulado. A BlackRock, com sua influência global e presença significativa no mercado brasileiro, serve como termômetro para o risco de práticas contábeis questionáveis, que podem afetar desde fundos de pensão até pequenos investidores. A investigação levanta debates sobre a necessidade de regulação mais rígida no setor, especialmente em um contexto de alta nos juros e busca por retornos atrativos.
O caso pode acelerar discussões sobre governança e fiscalização no mercado de crédito privado brasileiro, com possíveis desdobramentos em normas para fundos e empresas do segmento.
🇪🇸 Resumen en Español
La fiscalía federal de Manhattan ha abierto una investigación contra BlackRock, el gigante financiero, por posibles irregularidades en la valoración de los activos de su fondo de crédito privado, lo que podría afectar a miles de inversores. La pesquisa se centra en BlackRock TCP Capital Corp., una entidad cotizada en bolsa que gestiona miles de millones en préstamos a empresas no cotizadas.
El Departamento de Justicia estadounidense examina si BlackRock infló artificialmente el valor de sus inversiones en crédito privado, un sector en auge pero opaco, donde los precios no siempre reflejan el mercado real. Para los ahorradores hispanohablantes que confían en fondos de inversión o planes de pensiones vinculados a estas estrategias, el caso subraya la importancia de exigir mayor transparencia. Además, podría desencadenar una revisión regulatoria más amplia sobre cómo se valúan estos activos, un tema clave en un contexto de tipos de interés altos y mayor escrutinio sobre los riesgos ocultos en el sistema financiero.
Fortune
Read full article at Fortune →This post is a curated summary. All rights belong to the original author(s) and Fortune.
Was this article helpful?
Discussion